Nowadays, disruption predictors, based on machine learning techniques, can perform well but they typically do not provide any information about the type of disruption and cannot predict the time remaining before the current quench. On the other hand, the automatic identification of the disruption type is a crucial aspect required to optimize the remedial actions and a prerequisite to forecasting the time left for intervening. In this work, a stack of machine learning tools is applied to the task of automatic classification of the disruption types. The strategy is implemented from scratch and completely adaptive; the predictors start operating after the first disruption and update their own models, following the evolution of the experimental program, without any human intervention. Moreover, they are designed to implement a form of transfer learning, in the sense that they identify autonomously the most important disruption classes, generating new ones when necessary. The results obtained are very encouraging in terms of both prediction performance and classification accuracy. On the other hand, regarding the narrowing of the warning times, some progress has been achieved, but new techniques will have to be devised to obtain fully satisfactory properties.
Stacking of predictors for the automatic classification of disruption types to optimize the control logic
Murari, A.; Rossi, R.; Lungaroni, M.; Baruzzo, M.; Gelfusa, M.
Journal:
Nuclear fusion 61 (3),
pp. 036027-1 - 036027-20
Year:
2021
ISTP Authors: Andrea Murari
Keywords: disruptions, machine learning predictors, de-learning, ensembles of classifiers, adaptive learning, transfer learning, trajectory learning, stacks of predictors
Research Activitie: JOURNAL ARTICLES
Related products
-
Analytical letters 54 (12), pp. 2009 - 2021 Year: 2021 DOI: 10.1080/00032719.2020.1833021
Dry Ashing for Signal Enhancement in Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS)
Lazaro, Maisa Cristina; de Morais, Carla Pereira; Silva, Tiago Varao; Senesi, Giorgio Saverio; Santos Junior, Dario; Gomes Neto, Jose Anchieta; Ferreira, Edilene Cristina
-
Review of scientific instruments 92 (4), pp. 043556-1 - 043556-6 Year: 2021 DOI: 10.1063/5.0043669
Design of JT-60SA core Thomson scattering diagnostic system
Tojo H.; Pasqualotto R.; Fassina A.; Giudicotti L.; Sasao H.; Homma H.; Oyama N.
-
Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry 30 pp. e00121-1 - e00121-12 Year: 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.teac.2021.e00121
Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy applied to environmental systems and their potential contaminants. An overview of advances achieved in the last few years
Goncalves D.A.; Senesi G.S.; Nicolodelli G.
-
Fusion engineering and design 166 pp. 112315 - 1 - 112315 - 6 Year: 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112315
Cross machine investigation of magnetic tokamak dust: Morphological and elemental analysis
De Angeli M.; Ripamonti D.; Ghezzi F.; Tolias P.; Conti C.; Arnas C.; Jerab M.; Rudakov D.L.; Chrobak C.P.; Irby J.; LaBombard B.; Lipschultz B.; Maddaluno G.
English
Italiano