An early attention to the layout of both plant site and its buildings is essential in a complex plant under preliminary design as DEMO in order to meet the assigned targets, namely i) the licensing requirements ii) a good availability in delivery electricity to the grid. The layout definition has to follow several criteria that become more complex and stringent for nuclear buildings, e.g. functional, maintenance, fire protection, safety, human factors, shielding, and remote handling. The criterion As Low As Reasonable Achievable, with respect to the dose to the staff, has to be applied in design, operation, maintenance and decommissioning phases. The tokamak building, where several complex systems have to converge to the torus to create and control the plasma, to take out its energy and to produce and extract tritium, provides the second and ultimate confinement barrier between the environment and the hazardous and radioactive materials present inside that might be mobilised, in case of accident, by the high energetic fluids stored in DEMO systems. The layout criteria are focused on avoiding any challenge to the safety functions: e.g. no common mode failures of the safety classified systems for all reference design basis events. Furthermore the safety classified equipment have to maintain their safety function all over the plant life in such challenging environmental conditions; an accurate layout might allow the qualification possible, making milder the environment, e.g. defining adequate shielding and areas where radiation dose, magnetic field and accidental environmental conditions are reasonable for sensible equipment. The experience of NPPs and ITER is also recognized as the basis of such design criteria for DEMO. The paper will outline the main design basis events and the layout criteria presenting some applications for the tokamak building that reflect the recent progress of the DEMO design.
Key EU DEMO plant and building layout criteria
Ciattaglia S.; Federici G.; Barucca L.; de Magistris M.; Gaio E.; Gliss C.; Koerber M.; Moscato I.; Porfiri M.T.; Riedl F.; Tarallo A.
Related products
-
PCCP. Physical chemistry chemical physics (Print) 23 (29), pp. 15475 - 15479 Year: 2021 DOI: 10.1039/d1cp01976g
Reconciling experimental and theoretical vibrational deactivation in low-energy O + N2 collisions
Hong, Q., Bartolomei, M., Esposito, F., Sun, Q., Pirani, F.
-
Applied geochemistry 128 pp. 104929-1 - 104929-55 Year: 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2021.104929
Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy – A geochemical tool for the 21st century
Harmon R.S.; Senesi G.S.
-
The astrophysical journal. Letters (Print) 912 (2), pp. L21-1 - L21-8 Year: 2021 DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/abf7d1
Evolution of Solar Wind Turbulence from 0.1 to 1 au during the First Parker Solar Probe-Solar Orbiter Radial Alignment
Telloni, Daniele; Sorriso-Valvo, Luca; Woodham, Lloyd D.; Panasenco, Olga; Velli, Marco; Carbone, Francesco; Zank, Gary P.; Bruno, Roberto; Perrone, Denise; Nakanotani, Masaru; Shi, Chen; D’Amicis, Raffaella; De Marco, Rossana; Jagarlamudi, Vamsee K.; Steinvall, Konrad; Marino, Raffaele; Adhikari, Laxman; Zhao, Lingling; Liang, Haoming; Tenerani, Anna; Laker, Ronan; Horbury, Timothy S.; Bale, Stuart D.; Pulupa, Marc; Malaspina, David M.; Macdowall, Robert J.; Goetz, Keith; De Wit, Thierry Dudok; Harvey, Peter R.; Kasper, Justin C.; Korreck, Kelly E.; Larson, Davin; Case, Anthony W.; Stevens, Michael L.; Whittlesey, Phyllis; Livi, Roberto; Owen, Christopher J.; Livi, Stefano; Louarn, Philippe; Antonucci, Ester; Romoli, Marco; O’Brien, Helen; Evans, Vincent; Angelini, Virginia
-
The astrophysical journal. Letters (Online) 922 (1), pp. L18-1 - L18-5 Year: 2021 DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac36cf
Turbulent Magnetogenesis in a Collisionless Plasma
Pucci F.; Viviani M.; Valentini F.; Lapenta G.; Matthaeus W.H.; Servidio S.
English
Italiano