For many years, machine learning tools have proved to be very powerful disruption predictors in tokamaks. On the other hand, the vast majority of the techniques deployed assume that the input data is independent and is sampled from exactly the same probability distribution for the training set, the test set and the final real time deployment. This hypothesis is certainly not verified in practice, since the experimental programmes evolve quite rapidly, resulting typically in ageing of the predictors and consequent suboptimal performance. This paper describes various adaptive training strategies that have been tested to maintain the performance of disruption predictors in non-stationary conditions. The proposed approaches have been implemented using new ensembles of classifiers, explicitly developed for the present application. The improvements in performance are unquestionable and, given the difficulties encountered so far in translating predictors from one device to another, the proposed adaptive methods from scratch can therefore be considered a useful option in the arsenal of alternatives envisaged for the next generation of devices, particularly at the very beginning of their operation.
Adaptive learning for disruption prediction in non-stationary conditions
Murari A.; Lungaroni M.; Gelfusa M.; Peluso E.; Vega J.
Journal:
Nuclear fusion (Online) 59 (8),
pp. 086037-1 - 086037-11
Year:
2019
ISTP Authors: Andrea Murari
Keywords: de-learning, obsolescence, ensembles of classifiers, disruptions, machine learning predictors, adaptive training
Research Activitie: JOURNAL ARTICLES
Related products
-
Atomic spectroscopy 42 (1), pp. 18 - 24 Year: 2021 DOI: 10.46770/AS.2020.202
Spark discharge-libs: Evaluation of one-point and multi-voltage calibration for p and al determination
Vieira A.L.; Ferreira E.C.; Junior D.S.; Senesi G.S.; Neto J.A.G.
-
Nuclear fusion 61 (7), pp. 076013-1 - 076013-15 Year: 2021 DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/abfcdf
Prediction of temperature barriers in weakly collisional plasmas by a Lagrangian coherent structures computational tool
Di Giannatale G.; Bonfiglio D.; Cappello S.; Chacon L.; Veranda M.
-
Astronomy & astrophysics (Print) 653 pp. A156-1 - A156-16 Year: 2021 DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140279
Bridging hybrid- and full-kinetic models with Landau-fluid electrons I. 2D magnetic reconnection
Finelli F.; Cerri S.S.; Califano F.; Pucci F.; Laveder D.; Lapenta G.; Passot T.
-
Fusion engineering and design 166 pp. 112315 - 1 - 112315 - 6 Year: 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112315
Cross machine investigation of magnetic tokamak dust: Morphological and elemental analysis
De Angeli M.; Ripamonti D.; Ghezzi F.; Tolias P.; Conti C.; Arnas C.; Jerab M.; Rudakov D.L.; Chrobak C.P.; Irby J.; LaBombard B.; Lipschultz B.; Maddaluno G.
English
Italiano