Understanding and quantifying the mutual influence between systems remain crucial but challenging tasks in any scientific enterprise. The Pearson correlation coefficient, the mutual information, and the information quality ratio are the most widely used indicators, only the last two being valid for nonlinear interactions. Given their limitations, a new criterion is proposed, the reciprocal influence criterion, which is very simple conceptually and does not make any assumption about the statistics of the stochastic variables involved. In addition to being normalised as the information quality ratio, it provides a much better resilience to noise and much higher stability to the issues related to the determination of the involved probability distribution functions. A conditional version, to counteract the effects of confounding variables, has also been developed, showing the same advantages compared to the more traditional indicators. A series of systematic tests with numerical examples is reported, to compare the properties of the new indicator with the more traditional ones, proving its clear superiority in practically all respects.
The Reciprocal Influence Criterion: An Upgrade of the Information Quality Ratio
Rossi R.; Gelfusa M.; De Masi F.; Ossidi M.; Murari A.
Journal:
Complexity (Online) 2021 pp. 9426547-1 - 9426547-14
Year:
2021
ISTP Authors: Andrea Murari
Keywords: information quality ratio, Reciprocal Influence Criterion
Research Activitie: JOURNAL ARTICLES
Related products
-
Nuclear fusion 61 (7), pp. 076013-1 - 076013-15 Year: 2021 DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/abfcdf
Prediction of temperature barriers in weakly collisional plasmas by a Lagrangian coherent structures computational tool
Di Giannatale G.; Bonfiglio D.; Cappello S.; Chacon L.; Veranda M.
-
Review of scientific instruments 92 (4), pp. 043556-1 - 043556-6 Year: 2021 DOI: 10.1063/5.0043669
Design of JT-60SA core Thomson scattering diagnostic system
Tojo H.; Pasqualotto R.; Fassina A.; Giudicotti L.; Sasao H.; Homma H.; Oyama N.
-
Nuclear fusion 61 (7), pp. 076012-1 - 076012-14 Year: 2021 DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/abfb13
H-mode plasmas in the pre-fusion power operation 1 phase of the ITER research plan
Loarte A.; Polevoi A.R.; Schneider M.; Pinches S.D.; Fable E.; Militello Asp E.; Baranov Y.; Casson F.; Corrigan G.; Garzotti L.; Harting D.; Knight P.; Koechl F.; Parail V.; Farina D.; Figini L.; Nordman H.; Strand P.; Sartori R.
-
Atomic spectroscopy 42 (1), pp. 18 - 24 Year: 2021 DOI: 10.46770/AS.2020.202
Spark discharge-libs: Evaluation of one-point and multi-voltage calibration for p and al determination
Vieira A.L.; Ferreira E.C.; Junior D.S.; Senesi G.S.; Neto J.A.G.
English
Italiano