Over the years, until the present days, a persistent mistake has been found in the literature: the use of the ‘vibrational temperature’ of an emitting electronic state as somewhat representative of the vibrational temperature of the gas in the discharge. Such a temperature is determined by fitting the spectra measured by optical emission spectroscopy. Besides the misuse of the word temperature, the results of such fittings are ambiguously named ‘vibrational temperature’ and sometimes used to argue about the vibrational non-equilibrium and its variation with discharge conditions. What has this temperature to do with the vibrational excitation of the molecules’ ground state, i.e. of the large majority of gas components? It is well established that the connection between the vibrational population of the excited and the ground state exists through the excitation process, the collisional quenching, and the vibrational relaxation in the manifold of the excited state. Nevertheless, this is very often ignored in the literature. In this note, we discuss this subject with the example of the ‘vibrational temperature’ of the N-2(C, v) manifold, showing how much all the mentioned parameters can drive to incorrect deductions from an anyway conceptually wrong measurement.
On the determination of the vibrational temperature by optical emission spectroscopy
Dilecce G.; Ambrico P.F.; Martini L.M.; Tosi P.
Journal:
Plasma sources science & technology (Print) 31 (7),
pp. 077001-1 - 077001-8
Year:
2022
ISTP Authors: Giorgio Dilecce
Paolo Francesco Ambrico
Keywords: Optical Emission Spectroscopy, plasma diagnostics, gas discharges
Research Activitie: JOURNAL ARTICLES
Related products
-
Journal of plasma physics (Print) 87 (1), pp. 825870101-1 - 825870101-20 Year: 2021 DOI: 10.1017/S0022377820001567
Local and global properties of energy transfer in models of plasma turbulence
Vasconez, Christian L.; Perrone, D.; Marino, R.; Laveder, D.; Valentini, F.; Servidio, S.; Mininni, P.; Sorriso-Valvo, L.
-
Fusion engineering and design 166 pp. 112315 - 1 - 112315 - 6 Year: 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112315
Cross machine investigation of magnetic tokamak dust: Morphological and elemental analysis
De Angeli M.; Ripamonti D.; Ghezzi F.; Tolias P.; Conti C.; Arnas C.; Jerab M.; Rudakov D.L.; Chrobak C.P.; Irby J.; LaBombard B.; Lipschultz B.; Maddaluno G.
-
Atomic spectroscopy 42 (1), pp. 18 - 24 Year: 2021 DOI: 10.46770/AS.2020.202
Spark discharge-libs: Evaluation of one-point and multi-voltage calibration for p and al determination
Vieira A.L.; Ferreira E.C.; Junior D.S.; Senesi G.S.; Neto J.A.G.
-
Nuclear fusion 61 (7), pp. 076012-1 - 076012-14 Year: 2021 DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/abfb13
H-mode plasmas in the pre-fusion power operation 1 phase of the ITER research plan
Loarte A.; Polevoi A.R.; Schneider M.; Pinches S.D.; Fable E.; Militello Asp E.; Baranov Y.; Casson F.; Corrigan G.; Garzotti L.; Harting D.; Knight P.; Koechl F.; Parail V.; Farina D.; Figini L.; Nordman H.; Strand P.; Sartori R.
English
Italiano