Disruption predictors based on traditional machine learning have been very successful in present day devices but have shown some fundamental limitations in the perspective of the next generation of Tokomaks, such as ITER and DEMO. In particular, even the most performing require an unrealistic number of examples to learn, tend to become obsolete very quickly and cannot easily cope with new problems. These drawbacks can all be traced back to the type of training adopted: closed world training. In the contribution, it is shown how the new approach of open world training can solve or at least significantly alleviate the aforementioned issues. Adaptive techniques, based on ensembles of classifiers, allow following the changes in the experimental programmes and the evolution in the nature of the disruptions. Exploiting unsupervised clustering, new predictors can autonomously detect the need for the definition of new disruption types, not yet seen in the past. All the solutions can be implemented from scratch, meaning that the predictors can start operating with just one example of disruptive and one of safe discharge. The proposed techniques would obviously be particularly valuable at the beginning of the operation of new devices, when experience is limited and not many example are available.
Open world learning: a new paradigm for disruption prediction
Gelfusa M.; Murari A.; Lungaroni M.; Rossi R.; Spolladore L.; Vega J.
Related products
-
48th EPS Conference on Plasma Physics, , Online, Amsterdam timezone , 27 June - 1 July 2022 Year: 2022
Predict-first scenario modelling in support of the design of the Divertor Tokamak Test facility
Casiraghi I.; Mantica P.; Ambrosino R.; Aucone L.; Auriemma F.; Baiocchi B.; Balbinot L.; Barberis T.; Bonanomi N.; Castaldo A.; Citrin J.; Frassinetti L.; Innocente P.; Koechl F.; Mariani A.; Nowak S.; Agostinetti P.; Ceccuzzi S.; Figini L.; Granucci G.; Valisa M.
-
International Conference on Ion Sources (ICIS2021), , Virtual Conference America/Vancouver , 20-24 September 2021 Year: 2021
First Operations with Caesium of the Negative Ion Source SPIDER
Sartori E.; Agostini M.; Barbisan M.; Bigi M.; Boldrin M.; Brombin M.; Casagrande R.; Dal Bello S.; Dan M.; Duteil B.P.; Fadone M.; Grando L.; Maistrello A.; Pavei M.; Pimazzoni A.; Poggi C.; Rizzolo A.; Shepherd A.; Ugoletti M.; Veltri P.; Zaniol B.; Agnello R.; Agostinetti P.; Aprile D.; Candeloro V.; Cavallini C.; Cavazzana R.; Cavenago M.; Chitarin G.; Cristofaro S.; Dalla Palma M.; Delogu R.; De Muri M.; Denizeau S.; Fellin F.; Ferro C.; Gasparrini C.; Jain P.; Luchetta A.; Manduchi G.; Marconato N.; Marcuzzi D.; Mario I.; Milazzo R.; Pasqualotto R.; Patton T.; Pilan N.; Recchia M.; Rigoni-Garola A.; Siragusa M.; Spolaore M.; Taliercio C.; Toigo V.; Zagorski R.; Zanotto L.; Zaupa M.; Zuin M.; Serianni G.
-
9th Runaway Electron Modelling (REM) Meeting, , Garching, Germany , 2-6 May 2022 Year: 2022
Start-up RE: review of conditions, COMPASS database analysis and initial look at AUG database
Ficker O.; Thienpondt H.; Macusova E.; Hoppe M.; Caloud J.; Mlynar J.; Casolari A.; Hobirk J.; Spolladore L.; Rossi R.; Murari A.; Weinzettl V.; Havlicek J.; Farnik M.; Svoboda J.; Hron M.; Papp G.; Sheikh U.; Reux C.
-
ILO - Industrial Opportunity Days 2022, , Capodimonte, Napoli, Italy , 9-10 June 2022 Year: 2022
DTT Vacuum Vessel
Dalla Palma M.
English
Italiano