Disruption predictors based on traditional machine learning have been very successful in present day devices but have shown some fundamental limitations in the perspective of the next generation of Tokomaks, such as ITER and DEMO. In particular, even the most performing require an unrealistic number of examples to learn, tend to become obsolete very quickly and cannot easily cope with new problems. These drawbacks can all be traced back to the type of training adopted: closed world training. In the contribution, it is shown how the new approach of open world training can solve or at least significantly alleviate the aforementioned issues. Adaptive techniques, based on ensembles of classifiers, allow following the changes in the experimental programmes and the evolution in the nature of the disruptions. Exploiting unsupervised clustering, new predictors can autonomously detect the need for the definition of new disruption types, not yet seen in the past. All the solutions can be implemented from scratch, meaning that the predictors can start operating with just one example of disruptive and one of safe discharge. The proposed techniques would obviously be particularly valuable at the beginning of the operation of new devices, when experience is limited and not many example are available.
Open world learning: a new paradigm for disruption prediction
Gelfusa M.; Murari A.; Lungaroni M.; Rossi R.; Spolladore L.; Vega J.
Related products
-
Technical Meeting on Synergies in Technology Development between Nuclear Fission and Fusion for Energy Production, , Vienna and online , 6-10 June 2022 Year: 2022
PILOT HYBRID EXPERIMENT WITH REVERSED FIELD PINCH AS NEUTRON SOURCE AND DOUBLE FISSION TEST BEDS: AN INNOVATIVE STAGE APPROACH TOWARDS A FULL POWER FUSION-FISSION HYBRID REACTOR
Piovan R.; Agostinetti P.; Bustreo C.; Cavazzana R.; Cemmi A.; Ciotti M.; Cherubini N.; Escande D.E.; Gaio E.; Lomonaco G.; Lunardon F.; Maistrello A.; Marrelli L.; Murgo S.; Orsitto F.P.; Osipenko M.; Panza F.; Pompeo N.; Puiatti M.E.; Ricco G.; Ripani M.; Valisa M.; Zollino G.; Zuin M.
-
FuseNet PhD Event 2022, , Padova, Italy , 4-6 July, 2022 Year: 2022
Modelling plasma dynamics in linear plasma devices with 0D, 2D and 3D approaches
Tonello E.; Carpita M.; Alberti G.; Formenti A.; Uccello A.; Passoni M.; Ricci P.
-
3rd European Conference on Plasma Diagnostics (ECPD 2019), , Lisbon, Portugal , May 6-9, 2019 Year: 2019
High Resolution Probe for filament transport and current density study at the edge region of W7-X
Spolaore M.; Agostinetti P.; Killer C.; Cavazzana R.; Ghiraldelli R.; Grenfell G.; Grulke O.; Moresco M.; Martines E.; Neubauer O.; Nicolai D.; Satheeswaran G.; Schweer B.; Vianello N.; Visentin M.; W7-X Team
-
International Conference on Ion Sources (ICIS2021), , Virtual Conference America/Vancouver , 20-24 September 2021 Year: 2021
First Operations with Caesium of the Negative Ion Source SPIDER
Sartori E.; Agostini M.; Barbisan M.; Bigi M.; Boldrin M.; Brombin M.; Casagrande R.; Dal Bello S.; Dan M.; Duteil B.P.; Fadone M.; Grando L.; Maistrello A.; Pavei M.; Pimazzoni A.; Poggi C.; Rizzolo A.; Shepherd A.; Ugoletti M.; Veltri P.; Zaniol B.; Agnello R.; Agostinetti P.; Aprile D.; Candeloro V.; Cavallini C.; Cavazzana R.; Cavenago M.; Chitarin G.; Cristofaro S.; Dalla Palma M.; Delogu R.; De Muri M.; Denizeau S.; Fellin F.; Ferro C.; Gasparrini C.; Jain P.; Luchetta A.; Manduchi G.; Marconato N.; Marcuzzi D.; Mario I.; Milazzo R.; Pasqualotto R.; Patton T.; Pilan N.; Recchia M.; Rigoni-Garola A.; Siragusa M.; Spolaore M.; Taliercio C.; Toigo V.; Zagorski R.; Zanotto L.; Zaupa M.; Zuin M.; Serianni G.
English
Italiano