Nuclear fusion is one of the best options to achieve a virtually limitless energy source in the future. However, sustaining burning plasma reactions is very challenging because disruptive events cause the loss of plasma confinement and damages to the tokamak machine. Thus, reproducing a nuclear fusion reaction on Earth represents an actual scientific and technical challenge. Next generation machines must be able to predict, mitigate or avoid the disruptions but the present understanding of the phenomenon has not yet gone so far as to provide a physical model describing their root cause. On the contrary, a large quantity of experimental disruption data exists. For these reason, in the last decades, machine learning techniques have been applied to design alarm systems both for mitigating or to actively avoid approaching disruptions. More recently, the disruption predictor concept has been evolving toward a more complex system, able to detect the proximity of the plasma state to the boundaries of the operational space free from disruptions in order to schedule avoidance strategies rather than mitigation actions. This system should also be able to determine which type of disruption is about to occur in order to efficiently take suitable disruption avoidance actions. This paper reports an overview of machine learning algorithms as tools for disruption prediction and classification at JET, the world’s largest operational plasma physics experiment, located at Culham Centre for Fusion Energy in Oxfordshire, UK. Both traditional neural network models for disruption prediction and manifold learning approaches as a tool for plasma operational space mapping and visualization, disruption prediction and classification, are described.
Disruption Prediction Approaches Using Machine Learning Tools in Tokamaks
Sias G.; Cannas B.; Carcangiu S.; Fanni A.; Murari A.; Pau A.; JET Contributors
Conference:
PhotonIcs & Electromagnetics Research Symposium (Progress In Electromagnetics Research Symposium) PIERS 2019,
pp. 2880 - 2890 , Rome, Italy , 17-20 June, 2019
Year:
2019
ISTP Authors: Andrea Murari
Keywords: tokamaks, Springs, Training, Predictive models, Discharges (electric), Neural networks
Research Activitie: CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS
Related products
-
46th European Physical Society Conference on Plasma Physics (EPS 2019), pp. 1 - 4 , Milan, Italy , 8-12 July 2019 Year: 2019
A real case of complex network controllability: the NIO1 ion beam source
Ferron N.; Antoni V.; Agostinetti P.; Barbisan M.; Cavenago M.; Chitarin G.; Delogu R.; Pimazzoni A.; Poggi C.; Sartori E.; Serianni G.; Suweis S.; Ugoletti M.; Veltri P.
-
46th European Physical Society Conference on Plasma Physics (EPS 2019), pp. 1 - 4 , Milan, Italy , 8-12 July 2019 Year: 2019
Nonlocal transport in toroidal plasma devices in the presence of magnetic perturbations
Spizzo G.; White R.B.; Maraschek M.; Igochine V.; Granucci G.; the ASDEX Upgrade Team; the EUROfusion MST1 Team
-
29th International Conference Nuclear Energy for New Europe - NENE 2020, pp. 513-1 - 513-8 , Portoroz, Slovenia , September 7-10, 2020 Year: 2020
Calorimeter Design for Neutral Beam Injector of DTT – Thermo-hydraulic Analysis
Koncar B.; Ovtar D.; Costa Garrido O.; Draksler M.; Agostinetti P.
-
46th European Physical Society Conference on Plasma Physics (EPS 2019), pp. 1 - 4 , Milan, Italy , 8-12 July 2019 Year: 2019
Physics requirements for the VUV survey spectrometer intended for the divertor radiation monitoring on JT-60SA
Valisa M.; Biel W.; Bombarda F.; Carraro L.; Chernyshova M.; Coffey I.; Czarski T.; Davis S.; Fassina A.; Fornal T.; Gabellieri L.; Kowalska-Strzeciwilk E.; Ksiazek I.; Lawson K.; Malinowski K.; O’Mullane M.; Nakano T.; Oyama N.; Romano A.; Puiatti M.E.; Scully S.; Soare S.; Sozzi C.
English
Italiano