Disruption predictors based on traditional machine learning have been very successful in present day devices but have shown some fundamental limitations in the perspective of the next generation of Tokomaks, such as ITER and DEMO. In particular, even the most performing require an unrealistic number of examples to learn, tend to become obsolete very quickly and cannot easily cope with new problems. These drawbacks can all be traced back to the type of training adopted: closed world training. In the contribution, it is shown how the new approach of open world training can solve or at least significantly alleviate the aforementioned issues. Adaptive techniques, based on ensembles of classifiers, allow following the changes in the experimental programmes and the evolution in the nature of the disruptions. Exploiting unsupervised clustering, new predictors can autonomously detect the need for the definition of new disruption types, not yet seen in the past. All the solutions can be implemented from scratch, meaning that the predictors can start operating with just one example of disruptive and one of safe discharge. The proposed techniques would obviously be particularly valuable at the beginning of the operation of new devices, when experience is limited and not many example are available.
Open world learning: a new paradigm for disruption prediction
Gelfusa M.; Murari A.; Lungaroni M.; Rossi R.; Spolladore L.; Vega J.
Related products
-
MeVArc - 10th International Workshop on the Mechanisms of Vacuum Arcs (Hybrid MeVArc 2022), , Chania, Crete , 18-22 September 2022 Year: 2022
X-RAY MEASUREMENTS REVEAL THE FINE DYNAMICS OF CURRENT MICRO-DISCHARGES IN A VACUUM HIGH VOLTAGE EXPERIMENT
Spagnolo S.; Pilan N.; De Lorenzi A.; Fontana C.; Pino F.; Cordaro L.; Croci G.; Fincato M.; Lotto L.; Mario I.; Martines E.; McCormack O.; Muraro A.; Patton T.; Rigamonti D.; Spada E.; Tardocchi M.; Zuin M.
-
9th Runaway Electron Modelling (REM) Meeting, , Garching, Germany , 2-6 May 2022 Year: 2022
Start-up RE: review of conditions, COMPASS database analysis and initial look at AUG database
Ficker O.; Thienpondt H.; Macusova E.; Hoppe M.; Caloud J.; Mlynar J.; Casolari A.; Hobirk J.; Spolladore L.; Rossi R.; Murari A.; Weinzettl V.; Havlicek J.; Farnik M.; Svoboda J.; Hron M.; Papp G.; Sheikh U.; Reux C.
-
9th Runaway Electron Modelling (REM) Meeting, , Garching, Germany , 2-6 May 2022 Year: 2022
Massive-material-injection-triggered disruptions: what do we understand? what is still unclear?
Nardon E.; Artola F.J.; Bonfiglio D.; Hoelzl M.; Hu D.; Kong M.; Lee S.J.; Lehnen M.; Matsujama A. Sadouni S.; Sarkimaki K.; Sommariva C.; Wieschollek F.
-
Workshop on Electric Fields, Turbulence and Self-Organization Magentized Plasmas (EFTSOMP 2019), , Padova, Italy , 15-16 July 2019 Year: 2019
3D filamentary transport and the role of edge sheared radial electric fields in the RFX-mod tokamak
Grenfell G.; Spolaore M.; Abate D.; Carraro L.; Marrelli L.; van Milligen B.; Predebon I.; Spagnolo S.; Veranda M.; Agostini M.; Cavazzana R.; Cordaro L.; De Masi G.; Franz P.; Martines E.; Momo B.; Puiatti M.E.; Scarin P.; Vianello N.; Zaniol B.; Zuin M.; RFX-mod Team
English
Italiano