{"id":7235,"date":"2021-08-03T15:39:52","date_gmt":"2021-08-03T15:39:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.istp.cnr.it\/?post_type=product&#038;p=7235"},"modified":"2022-06-21T09:55:42","modified_gmt":"2022-06-21T09:55:42","slug":"validation-of-quasi-linear-turbulent-transport-models-against-plasmas-with-dominant-electron-heating-for-the-prediction-of-iter-pfpo-1-plasmas","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/www.istp.cnr.it\/it\/research-product\/validation-of-quasi-linear-turbulent-transport-models-against-plasmas-with-dominant-electron-heating-for-the-prediction-of-iter-pfpo-1-plasmas\/","title":{"rendered":"Validation of quasi-linear turbulent transport models against plasmas with dominant electron heating for the prediction of ITER PFPO-1 plasmas"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Kinetic profile predictions of ITER PFPO-1 plasmas require high accuracy in the central electron temperatures to be applied to the calculation of third harmonic electron cyclotron absorption. Correctly predicting the transition from L-mode to H-mode further requires precise estimates of the ion heat flux in the periphery of the plasma. Recent versions of the quasi-linear transport models TGLF and QuaLiKiz were tested against an extensive set of experimental results from ASDEX Upgrade (AUG) and JET-ILW, where the focus was put on AUG plasmas heated by ECRH. Spectra obtained from TGLF are compared to a set of linear gyrokinetic simulations performed with GKW. Electron and ion temperature profiles obtained with TGLF-SAT1geo show good agreement with the experimental profiles, but there is a slight tendency to underpredict central T e and T i at high ratios T e\/T i. QuaLiKiz yields reasonable results for T e and T i profiles in plasmas where the ion temperature gradient mode is dominant, but predicts a significantly too weak transport in the presence of dominant trapped electron modes in conditions of strong central electron heating.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kiefer C.K.; Angioni C.; Tardini G.; Bonanomi N.; Geiger B.; Mantica P.; Putterich T.; Fable E.; Schneider P.A.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":1294,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":[],"product_cat":[574],"product_tag":[2192],"class_list":["post-7235","product","type-product","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","product_cat-journal-articles","product_tag-tokamakturbulent-transportiter-prefusion-power-operationvalidation-quasi-linear-models","prodpage-style2"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.istp.cnr.it\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product\/7235","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.istp.cnr.it\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.istp.cnr.it\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/product"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.istp.cnr.it\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7235"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.istp.cnr.it\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1294"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.istp.cnr.it\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7235"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"product_cat","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.istp.cnr.it\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product_cat?post=7235"},{"taxonomy":"product_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.istp.cnr.it\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product_tag?post=7235"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}